Most of the intelligent complexity of the individual neuron (~a single celled animal focusing on survival) will not to contribute to the intelligence of the brain. Likewise, the intelligence of a civilization is far less than the sum of the intelligences of all its humans.
-
-
Replying to @MostlyDev
One may also anthropomorphize people too much. The mind of an individual is probably not best understood as a single cohesive, unified entity.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MostlyDev
In a similar way as we can treat a person as cohesive because of the way its mental faculties are integrated, there is cohesion in a society via institutions, shared ideas and the praxis they inform.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MostlyDev
Nono, the DNA/RNA Turing machine inside of the cell does not directly contribute very much to how the organism makes sense of its environment via its nervous system. And the capacities of the larger system happen to be more impressive, even if implementation complexity is lower.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MostlyDev
In the sense that intelligence is about making models, civilizations form and use models that individuals don't.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
There is no single individual who could make an entire car, from the rubber in its tires to the design of the engine and the microchips in its computers.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.