This strikes me as irresponsible: Floridi refers to AGI as "Robocop" (which is a strawman nobody worries about, and not even about AI, but about ethics of human identity), and conflates present AI with AGI, which he (unlike most experts) considers totally impossible.https://twitter.com/UniofOxford/status/1090511933449609216 …
-
0:59 -
Replying to @Plinz
What do you think about his points concerning present AI?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HahTse
I think they are correct, but also quite obvious. However, I suspect that he does not mean "banking", but FinTec. AI in trading is a major danger for financial systems IMHO.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Well operating with RoboCop indicates, that he opted purposefull against the term fintech. Nevertheless this is a pathetic piece of work: ivy league bashing all people with concerns as uninformed & against progress. I am sad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @archaeoklammt @HahTse
It probably means that he does not only understand computer science, but also does not read science fiction. But he understands his incentives.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @archaeoklammt
Is there a "not" missing after the "only"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.