I think it is necessary/desirable to take a super-inclusive approach because I'm trying to introduce a conceptual shift that is metaphysically fundamental. What a 'self' or a 'mind' is seems debatable. I can reduce them to nested histories of sensation.
-
-
I trust that you are aware my critique of that logic is impersonal. I have complete respect for you, and for analytic proofs as well.
-
Likewise, I argue from a position of full personal respect.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think I can see the logic that you're using also, with its expectation of a certain kind of reliability and the confidence of the universality of your observables being symptoms of its Incompleteness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.