I don’t understand most of this, but I 100% trust you.
It appears that you employ a mode of thought that is consistently overfitting. Are you possibly constructing patterns where there are not required by the observables, just because they are consistent with what you already hold to be true?
-
-
I have different observables. From my perspective your sense of my overfitting is biased by what you (and most other highly intelligent but analytical thinkers) already think is true. I think that the universe is fundamentally based on overfitting.
-
I don’t think that we have different observables at all. I think I can see the logic by which you get to your interpretations, based on an associative model generation that is unreliable where it should be augmented with analytical proofs.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.