There seems to be a consensus now that the exposure to ideas, arguments and memes on youtube, facebook, google search and twitter must be carefully manipulated to make sure people don't elect the wrong politician or have the wrong idea about gay marriage. But why stop there?
-
-
It doesn’t. My point there was that peering down the slippery slope of content moderation and deciding it’s a bad a idea is allowing current bad behavior to remain for fear of unrealized harms. I really don’t know the answer, but I worry free speech as a concept may be too pure.
-
I don't know the answer either. Some of my first questions would be whether a human society based on fully informed and aware self interest works, what trajectories are obtainable, how they compare to the alternatives, and what can be implemented starting from the present state.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.