Hi Philosophy-Neuroscience twitter! Seems like some neuro folks want to know what the hell Philosophers of Mind (TM) do. I recommend reading these seven papers to start: Frege 1892; Putnam 1975 (and/or Burge 1979); Loar 1987; Kripke 1979; Kaplan 1977; Russell 1905; Perry 1979
-
-
That's a tricky question, re: "soft" material, specifically where things similar to Dewey and MP are concerned. I'm not sure you can get a "hard" account of mind that involves the social that doesn't fray at the edges, but it's worth looking into.
-
For that reason, I suspect we have to recover the social from the individual mind (other minds and their contents are a model imposed on the world by the individual mind). The social world is a domain of the physical world, not the normative or phenomenological domains.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.