The problem is people use “consciousness” without sufficient clarity. As per Searle no machine will have exactly the same kind of consciousness as an animal. BUT something analogous is almost certainly possible.https://twitter.com/Plinz/status/1110323073960435712 …
-
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
I’d say animals are wet-wear machines, hence have wet-ware consciousnesses. Dry-ware machines could have something analogous but not identical
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think machine consciousnesses would significantly differ from animal as do digesters unless they were heavily engineered to be similar.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @jim_rutt
I think that our mind arises over general function approximation, a set of regulation targets, some innate developmental biases, and the constraints of the substrate and environment. In this sense I fully agree, but for some domains, the engineering may not have to be heavy.
11:54 AM - 26 Mar 2019
from Stanford, CA
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.