Even if it's more efficient, there's a danger that all #AI will do is hard-wire systems that already make no sense.
With better leadership practices, this graph can easily be brought down to a more reasonable multiple of clinical staff without investing a penny in AI.
-
-
-
Why should admin be a multiple of clinical work?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
AI is unnecessary for automating administration. You can just write normal programs to do the job.
-
Today, AI means mostly the automation of real-time application of statistical modeling.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What happened in 1991/1992?
-
Reimbursement billing code regulation change taking effect late 80s. And then HIPAA regulation in the 90s. And then 2009 EMR implementation regulation. Need a lot of admins to handle billing primarily
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unlikely to need AI. More likely to need better software with better UX
-
But then what you're implying is that all software is AI? Which is not the case
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder if this underlines the excellent
@OurWorldInData findings: “US stands out as an outlier: it spends far more on health than any other country, yet the life expectancy of the American population is not longer, but actually shorter than in others..that spend far less”?pic.twitter.com/bi1URxxzsB
-
The dominant measure of US health policy is biomass per capita
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.