Whenever the members of a large group of people appear much more similar to each other than the members of your own group, you're probably not thinking clearly. (Example: men, women, whites, asians, gays, conservatives, liberals, psychologists, tech workers, wealthy, poor...)
On average, I think the opposite should be true? Should the size of the group not be inversely proportional to its exclusivity?
-
-
In my experience smaller groups are more reasonable in exchanging different perspectives and therefor more tolerant.large groups are purely driven by their emotions .Usually not very thoughtful and therefor less tolerant .
-
Smaller groups can afford to be very selective so they don’t have to be tolerant. The most extreme example may be a romantic relationship!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.