The way is the Socratic way. There is no way to design a curriculum, because it will be fixed by definition. It requires dialogue.
-
-
-
I am not so much interested in rhetorical flourishes that make people reflect on the fact that they are sometimes full of shit, but a systematic, rational and reliable way to gauge uncertainty.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There a acutual exists such a curriculum but folks are too jingoist and biased to give it credence AND it requires teachers who exemplify the process ( as in an apprenticeship arrangement)
-
Link?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In many cases, there is no solution to the fact that we are ignorant about the true state of affairs, but it is important to know the extent to which we lack information and our models are unreliable.
- 5 more replies
-
-
-
Some swear by Quantum Psychology by Robert Anton Wilson. I haven’t taken the dive into it but it looks interesting
-
It basically comes down to an anarchic, psychedelic and very humorous form of tantric enlightenment, but it describes only the beginning of a path with an uncertain end, not the result of fixing one's epistemological problems.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not sure about a curriculum but I'd start by looking at brain images (from people who seem biased & unbiased to a random audience) *while* they are expressing a bias. If we can find a signatures of bias, we might be able to begin to reverse engineer the opposite.
-
I don't think that it works that way. You probably cannot identify a biased idea by its neural correlates, you need to look at its epistemology.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.