Paradigmatic progress in the sciences has stalled since the 1970ies. There is disagreement about whether we have just figured out all the relevant paradigms, or whether we shifted from answering questions (which is cross disciplinary) to applying methods (cementing disciplines).
I really cannot judge David Deutsch's work, because I don't yet deeply understand what Constructor theory adds or does differently. I also don't understand the current discourse in foundational physics enough to have an opinion how physicists *should* react.
-
-
Neither can I, but I’m not pronouncing on his position within physics either. The question seemed to be if David represented some sort of refutation of your point. I’m merely saying he could just as well represent a good example of your point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.