Paradigmatic progress in the sciences has stalled since the 1970ies. There is disagreement about whether we have just figured out all the relevant paradigms, or whether we shifted from answering questions (which is cross disciplinary) to applying methods (cementing disciplines).
-
-
Doesn't Kuhn idea implies that for most of the time, science is in "normal mode" until a paradigm shift occurs? So then does it make sense to lament the absence of a paradigm shift if it is something exceptional?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.