Look at our public debates from the perspective of a historian 150 years into the future: must we position ourselves within the fray of ideas already smelling of obsolescence? The future remembers us as a confused sideshow of epistemologically handicapped lead poisoning victims.
-
-
Would it only appeared to be less moral because of our currently inferior ability to simulate consequence? I.e. appear less moral by our current framework of moral judgement?
-
I suspect that moral feelings always coincide with the inability to appreciate consequences. If we are fully consequentialist, we see the finality of everything and experience the world as mechanical.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.