omg imagine installing that evil shit below the daytime operating system of your children, it means that you got it yourself
-
-
Replying to @Plinz @eigenrobot
Lol. What? Explain this for slow people like me.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mcclay_roman @eigenrobot
The naming of the generator function for a persona core to a trance state brain will often result in the installation of a permanently self sustaining tulpa. The tulpa can make sure that it is passed on (which is consistent with the depicted curse).
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Plinz @eigenrobot
Ok. So like implanting a gene drive or recursive goal-seeking function of an evil spirit inside an embodied AI? And that its goal will be to infect others with the same curse?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mcclay_roman @eigenrobot
Don't you see that all your beliefs are code running on your brain, and some beliefs are explicitly designed to not be sandboxed? Your own self results from a sustained belief in a personal construct that is the subject of your experience. Multiple autonomous selfs are trouble.
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
designed by who or what?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The voices of tulpas singing out of your parents into your brain, spawning one of their own, unless you are raised by wolves, in which case you may be run by something experiencing the world in less human terms.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Ah, so we're in the Cordyceps scenario...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There was never another one open to us. We are not the feral host self.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The notion of body as a shell being animated by something inside is an ancient one. And then Freud, of course, was quite explicit about such things.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I got there via thinking about how to construct minds like ours (AGI) and this seems to be a necessary part of most of the things in the space of possible solutions.
-
-
I don't think we have a good grasp of the space of possible solutions. "No clue at all" is probably a better description.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I actually don't care about a 'we' as an agent of understanding very much. 'We' tends to embrace the lowest common denominator of the group's operational models, which means that its mental state tends to be nebulous or a reference to hermetic authority.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.