What I really find difficult about the causality debate in neuroscience is that when I say "your method does not establish causality but your field claims causality" I near universally hear "but other fields do the same". #NotAnArgument #CausalTruthExists
-
-
yes. In science there are correct arguments and incorrect arguments. And a thinking human being can distinguish the two. A method is like a human, without the thinking ;). For example, approaches that are correct for physics may fail for biology.
-
Yes, in the absence of meta models, the researcher embodies a model of its methodology that turns him into an operator on a shared body of ideas. It is terrifying that the researcher will have to be sacrificed if the architecture of the body is malformed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.