What I really find difficult about the causality debate in neuroscience is that when I say "your method does not establish causality but your field claims causality" I near universally hear "but other fields do the same". #NotAnArgument #CausalTruthExists
It seems to be a near universal problem since the end of scientific modernism in the 1970ies. Science does no longer define itself by questions, but by the application of methods. I sometimes wonder whether academia can recover from it or if it needs a reboot.
-
-
What makes science science _is_ the method (the scientific method). Where's the problem?
-
The problem is this: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.