what I really like about this project is: people publishing for the fame of the citations will immediately be turned off.
-
-
-
People will call it the 4chan of science
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no skin in the game. Maybe the journal would thrive because (1) one can lie, slander, misrepresent, etc and get away with it, (2) one can publish truths that offend and not be persecuted. Whether it will thrive or fail, attract writers and audience, we shall see.
-
A lit of good work is done anonymously. To make it work, they need to solve the reviewing problem though
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.