It’s because hiding it, even for a minority, is disadvantageous to the group. Anyone could make a connection you or your subset could not make alone. So everyone has to have the chance. Anything else is wasting time.
-
-
-
I think that everyone has the chance. But to make a dent in a problem that has kept some of the sharpest minds of the past five generations awake at night will usually require many years of full attention. Such attention is so rare that it has a medical name.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Intriguing perspective! Now I wish I had a programming environment with well defined axioms.
-
Mathematica?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would add really platform independent.
-
To be fair, a lot of mathematics is not really computable, i.e. so platform independent that it does not run in this universe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The overhead of namespaces and versioning has been optimized away by the human ability for contextual and probabilistic inference.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it doesn't need versioning because all math statements are proven, they never become "wrong" once formalized (unless of course the original proof and/or assumptions was wrong). Lack of namespace though...
-
You could say Math books are the packager manager
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.