In the future, everyone will have a detailed psychological simulation model of all their interaction partners, which can predict their responses with high accuracy. Negotiations will be simulated and tuned by bouncing models off each other, later the simulation becomes recursive.
-
-
But if everyone is running those simulations, wouldn't this - just like at the stock market - simply increase the computational power necessary to end up with a similiarly-poor prediction?
-
Think of it like playing chess. If both players can look father ahead, it may not change the distribution of wins to losses, but it will raise the level of the game. The next moves *will* become more predictable, and since the real world is not zero sum, outcomes increase too.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.