If the "consensus theory of truth" is false, then on what grounds does one derive the nature of truth from academic consensus?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
To be clear, I'm aware that objectivities are not contingent merely on human belief, but it's also impossible to relate to them absent signifiers & constructs, which are mutable & contingent
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Philosophy_Net @OpinionBroker
You can make your agency fully conditional on the truth of the constructs you use to justify your actions, as long as you can deal with the resource requirements to represent the rest of the distribution.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Philosophy_Net @OpinionBroker
I don't think that agency is intrinsically social (but it is intrinsically intentional, for a sufficient definition of intentionality). If behavior is conditioned on reflexes, the agency of the system is constrained by reflexes. (The elicitations of moral emotions are reflexes.)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Philosophy_Net @OpinionBroker
Does that mean that at the exact moment where the last human being leaves your neighborhood, your capacity for conscious agency is suddenly reduced to zero?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Would you say that writing a computer program does not constitute an act of conscious agency? I you admit that, does doing the same on a lonely island diminish the degree of conscious agency involved?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.