Yes, and I did not mean to condemn this. It is just what happens.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Many journalists don’t actually care about whether X happened: facts are just interchangeable tools to establish the desired consensus reality. If X did not actually happen, it is a mere inconvenience, because Xes are thought to be in principle happening all the time.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
It’s really easy to critique journalism but never do journalism.
-
You are the one making it sound like crime, not me
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On the contrary: Journalists merely reporting the fact "person x said statement y" without fact-checking y is a big problem in our current post-thruth politics. I find this very relevent for the current state of journalism:https://twitter.com/Klujypop/status/1018217609010012160 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally true, huh,
@vikingdanetrain?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I admire your tweets and look forward to parsing each one into prolog meta code in my mind. Nutritious substitute for the NYT crossword. Collection available?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was called “interpretative journalism.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.