I wonder how many people are aware that Ludwig Wittgenstein preempted the logicist program of AI a full century ago. And that the problems that Wittgenstein and symbolic AI ran into were the same. And that they are now being solved.
-
-
Wouldn’t Leibniz’s universal language count? Or do you reckon it is too different in its basic intention, or too vague and incomplete to quality as an attempt?
-
I think that Leibniz had a similar idea, but Wittgenstein actually tried to pull it off.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.