You are right: one is a trajectory, the other often just a state. Yet the evaluation of expertise should be always relative to what practitioners of a domain at certain levels of aptitude can hope to achieve, no? Runners won't self compare to cars, chess players not to computers.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
So, some sort of feedback is always useful, isn’t ? Ideally And advanced ethics, of course.
-
In a domain where most practitioners are not experts (like philosophy of mind, ethics, or some of the social sciences), feedback from others can be really confusing at first.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Self-evaluation is tricky.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or true domain experts can still be poorly integrated with other models which bring insecurity and miss attribute it to domain of expertise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.