Non-locality is easy to explain. Much harder to explain: locality. Locality is just way more familiar.
-
Show this thread
-
In the same way, I wonder if multiple personality disorder is not more obvious to explain than having a single, unified personality. That seems to be harder to achieve for a brain.
5 replies 3 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gdsimms
Nah, we simply cannot exist in parts of the universe that are entirely symmetrical. And neither in parts that have no symmetries. The question is now what produces the symmetries, and in such a way that they can be broken.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gdsimms
Oh, my response was just referring to physics. I don't see a need for symmetries at the level of the self.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The analogy refers to our faulty intuition that the easy problems are the familiar ones, and the hard ones the surprises.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.