Sadly handwavey attempt to refute Bayesianism, written in Kegan-3 languagehttp://nostalgebraist.tumblr.com/post/161645122124/bayes-a-kinda-sorta-masterpost …
I think that an attempt to criticize Bayesian rationalism requires more rigor, because the stakes are very high.
-
-
The "...they teach you" formulations are indicative of the toolbox approach, of course. If he would explain how "they" justify their teaching and he'd prove (instead of insinuate) why "they" are wrong he might become rationalist.
-
I was reading to the end and asked myself when they would present the better alternative to Bayesian inference. And then: least-squares methods with various regulations? Really?
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.