3. A deterministic irreversible universe turns reversible once it enters its period, thus it is in principle possible that it started out in an irreversible pattern but settled into the present one after a while.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
4. The fundamental rule of the universe should be extremely simple. If it is not, we are probably not in base reality, but in a simulation generated by a parent universe that itself (or one of its parents) should be generated by an extremely simple rule.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
5. A simple rule might be that the universe is generated by a superposition of all possible finite automata, some of which are information preserving, some of which generate n dimensional lattices which allow translations and rotations (which are differentiable permutations).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
6. Differentiable permutations are approximately scalefree automata that can be expressed as series of discrete automata operating at different scales. A rotation is an operator that relates multiple dimensions in a lattice.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
7. Rotations are either hyperbolic or euclidean (around an axis). The set of possible rotational operators gives rise to the set of spinor spaces.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
8. Particles are clusters of oscillating information (mass = disparity in time) that are propelled through a lattice by translational and rotational momentum (momentum = disparity in space). Fields are lattice irregularities propagated by the particles propelled by them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
9. Stable gliders are scalefree automata patterns that are stable only in low dimensional lattices. Gravitational stability only works in 3D, which is why planetary surfaces containing observers like us are 3D.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
10. The spatial resolution of the universe is not at the Planck length but probably more like a Fermi, because particles are represented across large regions of the lattice. The higher apparent resolution is the result of anti-aliasing (i.e. position = focal point of the region).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
11. We don't exist continuously but only at regular slices of the phase space, so we cannot observe the entire evolution of the universe vector. We blink in and out of existence. Measurement locks us into the same phase as that what we observe.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
Many questions on this: 1. in between we just don't exist at all? 2. I thought existence was the default state so how does that work? 3. "Phase" implies wave functions - are you postulating some dual nature like light perhaps? 4. Measurement effectively IS observation isn't it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
1. yes, 2. observation requires the instantiation of a suitable observer, 3. or something suitably periodic, which can also be discrete, 4. measurement is comparison of your own state; below a certain resolution it involves sharing state.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.