Intuition is the part of your knowledge that you cannot test for correctness. Proving correctness requires deriving a very low dimensional representation, so you can apply analytic operators. Most of the functions that a brain approximates cannot be translated into that form.
Not true! We can do at least 4D space (i.e. dims with rotational operators), and the tensor that we use to describe our perceptual content has hundreds of partially dependent dims (velocities and their first and second derivates, directions, colors, general distortions etc.).
-
-
3D spatial coordinates and orientation (people always forget the latter). Time is just simulated in spatial terms. It boils down to just a few relations (i.e. proximity, sequence, composition and distinguishability
@markburgess_osl ). -
I assume this means time is irrelevant to our experience in terms of what we deem intuitive?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.