Not “Weirdly”. Necessarily. See Popper or Deutsch or my summary: http://www.bretthall.org/blog/seeking-truth …https://twitter.com/plinz/status/1017521810840215552 …
-
-
I'm not sure what you're asking, exactly. I can say that negations of explanatory theories are not explanatory theories.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are not in contradiction, are not you? I cannot see any difference between “weird-curious” and “necessary” in the context you are discussing . First statement opens the door to new explanations under the Popper’ s rule being weird and necessary at the same time...
-
Only weird if you’ve never heard it before. I think that’s changing many places.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.