4. The fundamental rule of the universe should be extremely simple. If it is not, we are probably not in base reality, but in a simulation generated by a parent universe that itself (or one of its parents) should be generated by an extremely simple rule.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
5. A simple rule might be that the universe is generated by a superposition of all possible finite automata, some of which are information preserving, some of which generate n dimensional lattices which allow translations and rotations (which are differentiable permutations).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
6. Differentiable permutations are approximately scalefree automata that can be expressed as series of discrete automata operating at different scales. A rotation is an operator that relates multiple dimensions in a lattice.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
7. Rotations are either hyperbolic or euclidean (around an axis). The set of possible rotational operators gives rise to the set of spinor spaces.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
8. Particles are clusters of oscillating information (mass = disparity in time) that are propelled through a lattice by translational and rotational momentum (momentum = disparity in space). Fields are lattice irregularities propagated by the particles propelled by them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
9. Stable gliders are scalefree automata patterns that are stable only in low dimensional lattices. Gravitational stability only works in 3D, which is why planetary surfaces containing observers like us are 3D.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
10. The spatial resolution of the universe is not at the Planck length but probably more like a Fermi, because particles are represented across large regions of the lattice. The higher apparent resolution is the result of anti-aliasing (i.e. position = focal point of the region).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
11. We don't exist continuously but only at regular slices of the phase space, so we cannot observe the entire evolution of the universe vector. We blink in and out of existence. Measurement locks us into the same phase as that what we observe.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Plinz
12. The periodicity of the universe does not mean that it has to expand and shrink. It can also continuously expand, with new big bangs popping up in the gaps and unfolding into expanding copies. The universe is an eternally evolving fractal.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
Ya I like this one. Pop hypothesis for Dark Matter, eh? Only at the very large scale can we notice the universe expanding into itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Dark matter consists of classes of particles that don't share our electromagnetic, weak and strong force interactions. They participate in gravitational interactions (which is why we notice them at all), and probably in a bunch of their own dark force interactions.
-
-
Replying to @Plinz
Imho dark energy & matter seem like "fudge factors" highlighting the need to delve deeper. It seems like when everyone believed in the luminiferous aether. Then again, Tesla believed in an aether force field that dispensed with the need for S-T curvature: http://aetherforce.com/nikola-teslas-most-suppressed-quote/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.