Data do not understand cause and effect; functions do.https://twitter.com/DataSciFact/status/1012713607963009024 …
-
-
Eg, the beginning of this thread was fueled by my annoyance about Pearl's implicit human innateness claim, supported by the wrong intuitive argument. Of course data are inert! but transitions are not, and causality is just a particular kind of transition model, not human magic.
-
Spelling this out in detail for someone who is still puzzled by the concept of causality and has not read any Pearl might require a full page, but then again, is it really so complicated that it demands all that verbosity?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course, it is not possible here. To me the reason and meaning of this and similar communications lies in their openness. I appreciate it very much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.