Obviously, there are moral standards by which human sacrifice is ok. The problem arises when someone tries to construe humanist moral standards (antiracism etc.) to justify human sacrifice as acceptable "in the right context". There exist different, incompatible moral standards.
Hehe, I think that you interpret Kegan as some kind of moral ladder, instead of the number of layers in the self model. That is a trap in itself.
-
-
I interpret as a hierarchical system (a ladder, yes) but not a kind of moral ladder. Just that certain types of ethical reasoning are associated with each stage.
-
"Conversation" is a giveaway for considering ethics to be dependent on her hivemind, which means that she is not even self authoring. (Developing meta ethics sounds more like David's personal project, btw...)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.