If we cannot answer the annoying question of why there is something rather than nothing, perhaps we can at least answer why there is only something rather than everything. Perhaps existence is the default.
-
I don’t buy the initial statement “Why is there only something...”. Due to quantum information theory there is everyting at the same time. So the question is, why can we see only something...”. Or even better: “Who the fuck is the audience?”
Perhaps I can express if for you as: Why is there something that conforms to quantum information theory at all?
-
-
Your question is a different one, IMHO, and I suspect that the whole phase space may be successively implemented, but we only blink into existence in periodic intervals of that succession, i.e. our particles are not continuously actualized, and so we cannot observe all the states
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Sure. Answer is, because it’s possible. Otherwise we wouldn’t be here. This leads to the initial question. Where are all the other possibilities?
-
Well, obviously where we cannot see them. We can only see the part of the universe that loops information back at us.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It’s not for sure, that the calculation is done continuously and in same “direction” of the time. It could be done in reverse from a given point. Take a random state and calculate backwards threw a possible path to a beginning. It will “feel” same for an undividual in the game
-
If you push an object through the world, it leaves a groove that can be better explained by the previous presence of the object than by the universe's anticipation of that object. This spreading of the object's information corresponds to the entropic arrow.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.