Maybe the only comprehensible worlds are measurable ones, and timers emerge from measurement-constructed histories, so elementary tasks (those caused by timers) are possible if any "why" questions have answers. Why are explanations "possible"? Maybe bc only explainers survive.
-
-
-
I don't yet understand the Deutsch speak! How do you define task and constructor in normal computationalism?
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Current physics has an appealing answer: Symmetry
-
The symmetry is the result, isn’t it?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Probably there is everything, we just can only see the bits near us
-
Most things are too improbable or too self contradictory to exist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I doubt that anything can be infinite. But some things can be boundless. We should expect our universe to look infinite though, because if we'd live close to the boundary that region is probably not anisotropic enough to host us.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There isn't something/anything in the common sense. That would be illogical. Read your Feynman; He had the reasoning correct, it's just terribly inconvenient to calculate.
-
Can you point me to the particular argument you have in mind, please?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.