And this short line of code is “unnamed” . We can see “the first”, i.e. named, then second, etc. While to try to name “unnamed “(Tao) we loose the whole concept.
-
-
-
The short line of code has nothing to do with deeper meaning or cognition. It is just a boring automaton that incidentally creates universes if you compute it for long enough.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What's the nonexistence? A glitch implies it "was" before everything, if that be so, then it isn't nonexistence, it is existence itself.
-
Only in the sense as 1 comes before 2.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1) What is this "glitch"? 2) Why does it "happen" to nonexistence? 3)When it happens does it indicate "nonexistence" has some form/structure different from "existence"? 4) How that is different from "glitch in existence"? Could you please clarify?
-
It is just an expression for why I don't think there can be a very complex machine running at the root of existence. Evolution and intelligent design can produce such things, but both presuppose existence of a universe like ours. The universe itself must be simple.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Joscha, what are your thoughts on Spinoza’s concept of god?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.