That is not a bad quota for someone who thinks a lot. I suspect that you focus on being a publicist more than on being a philosopher?
The reason for the lack of interest of the crowds in your mortal toil is that you don't do very interesting things. In your attempts at relevance you seem to limit yourself to what's permissible. Trump and Peterson operate outside of what's permitted (which makes success harder).
-
-
So the actual mystery here is why you’re trying to figure me out at all. There’s really not much to figure out, so my theory is it bothers you to see unexplained divergence. It doesn’t bother me because I think divergence is the default and convergence is what needs explaining
-
Ah, ok. I did not realize that this is not obvious. I am interested in understanding specific divergence because I need to account for my own divergence. (I don't think you are not correct in assuming that convergence is not the default. Convergence is heavily selected for.)
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
(I would not expect that someone is flattered by my own attention to them. It am really quite irrelevant. As I said, I prize meaning and truth over relevance :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again all very true, you’re on fire here. I’m no transgressive revolutionary, and I stick to fairly banal, relevant, normie things. You probably didn’t get that I was joking about getting that kind of attention. I would hate it.
-
Btw, I am also not a transgressive revolutionary. I just feel that it is entirely irrelevant if other people consider the truth to be a transgression.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



