And truth is in the middle. ;-)https://twitter.com/Plinz/status/1000590448661057536 …
-
-
Replying to @JMoVS
The truth is harder so find than averaging over the available hypotheses. If you have two mutually conflicting theories that are partially correct, the middle ground will be often totally wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
Well, in this case I thought of the middle as an area, not the center exactly between both. I think in this case both views are at least partially right, so somewhere between both, as in mix the two and you‘ll get where we are in the world today seems good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JMoVS
Just as an example: What if we don’t need to calibrate the amount of trust we give our leaders differently (about which conservatives and liberals conflict), but change the process by which we determine and evaluate the leaders (which none of the groups discusses very much?).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Plinz
What I had in mind is that there is no right amount of trust individually but in sum, the moment some people trust more and some less, we get a distribution, which then reflects something more ideal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, and my point is not how much you should trust a person that is acting on the wrong incentives. That is possibly the wrong level of analysis.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.