And truth is in the middle. ;-)https://twitter.com/Plinz/status/1000590448661057536 …
Just as an example: What if we don’t need to calibrate the amount of trust we give our leaders differently (about which conservatives and liberals conflict), but change the process by which we determine and evaluate the leaders (which none of the groups discusses very much?).
-
-
What I had in mind is that there is no right amount of trust individually but in sum, the moment some people trust more and some less, we get a distribution, which then reflects something more ideal
-
Yes, and my point is not how much you should trust a person that is acting on the wrong incentives. That is possibly the wrong level of analysis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.