This has several moving parts, so it’s a bit complicated. First, there is no clear definition of “objective” or “objectively true,” as far as I have been able to discover. There are several pretty different uses that are all quite vague.
-
-
The great Chapman has decided that since there are topics where candidates for truth can not be found (AI), there can be no universal discernment methods. His connection to ground truth is severed, and he doubts to even have the language to properly say that it does not exist.
-
I am still angry at a certain vacuum cleaner salesman for having broken a brilliant mind. Then again, perhaps we would have lost a significant philosopher and potential Buddhist reformator to the maintenance of OpenAI gym competitions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.