Thanks! Our model considers past votes, turnout, and demographics. Past behavior rather than possible explanations of that behavior.
PlanScore presents the most comprehensive historical dataset of partisan gerrymandering ever assembled, and we’re just getting started. http://planscore.org pic.twitter.com/86vQTSLOc7
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Minnesota? The courts have drawn ours for decades. Secondly the state house and senate has flipped multiple times over the past 10 years. Your info makes no sense.
-
Thanks for your feedback! The metrics for Minnesota are indeed a mixed bag: in most cases the three primary metrics show a mixed picture with a sharply skewed EG in just some years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is the historical dataset utilized for this tool going to be made publicly available?
-
Hi Geoff, this tool *is* the historical data being made publicly available! Previously, it’s been summarized in expert reports, and not made linkable and inspectable on a public website like ours.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Very cool! I'd love to be able to compare arbitrary maps easily - the CA map in 1992 looks different from 2016, but it's hard to be sure.
-
Interesting! Would this be more sophisticated than opening them up in side-by-side browser windows?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
California map in 1974 is busted:https://planscore.org/california/#!1974-plan-ushouse-eg …
-
Ooh, will look into this
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Awesome! What does a purple skew indicate, polarized results in both directions?
-
These should be either red or blue … is there a chance you have one of the common red/green colorblindnesses? Will review the colors…
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.