I agree with this to some extent, but to include a character solely for their sexuality, or worse still to alter the sexual orientation of a pre-existing character, is actually more of an insult as it's tokenism. The concept of inclusion is nice but it's often executed horribly.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But I do like rainbow Mickey ears

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok but this is a HUGE deal for my young gay daughter

Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree, but the hats are still cute. I also highly implore you to look into Disney Park’s tolerance and inclusion of LGBT employees and guests, especially in a time period when it was greatly frowned upon and they caught a lot of heat. This is only the beginning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True, but I also want the ears
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lavishly staged musicals on Broadway and Gaston: pretty front and center, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think they would rather be represented in films. But it’s a start I guess
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about both? Both is even better! Why do we have to choose?
#getoveritThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We still have bisexual icon Shang from Mulan
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good grief, a decent story from PN’s!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.