In this case, yes. Next.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If he had taken a syringe of his own blood and injected into his victims, promising it to be something 'safe'. Would that be any different? The fact that his victims were coerced/bullied into sex shouldn't change your opinion. He was danger to the public, right thing to do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For those that spread it deliberately... but to stop the spread education, awareness raising and combatting stigma is the way forward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The issue here is not biological containment per se. It's a man purposely infecting people. So yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it's on purpose then yes anybody with a brain can see that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Criminal law isn’t the way to stop the spread of HIV biologically, but it IS the way to stop the abuse of those purposefully using the HIV virus as a way to attack and harm others. Those responsibly on meds should be recognised and encouraged.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes he did it on purpose. If you are at fault in a car
accident and hurt or kill some one your are charged criminally. That was an accident. He did it on purposeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In this case, it was the correct thing to do. He was essentially trying to commit murder. Prison time for that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.