Both are oppression though of different severity. Forced speech is wrong. Doesn't matter whether the imposed symbol is a rainbow or a cross.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Being moved behind the scenes isn't an alternative role, it's a demotion. So they are being "forced" to submit to the badge or move jobs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They should definitely talk about LGBT history, what's not necessary is implementing an obligatory dress code, just give them the option.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not an option. Are you seriously saying that changing their jobs isn't being used as a threat for those not wanting to wear the badge?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But are you really arguing for equality through sheer force? Wearing a symbol against your will merely turns people away from the cause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree. I think
@IzzyLyons won@SkyNews debate hands down. I think bossy@nationaltrust has come across as against personal#liberty.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are trying to impose your beliefs on other people. Perhaps the NT staff should wear 'Proud To Be Hetrosexual' badges. Suit you? No? Hmm.
-
Oh dear. The organisation these people volunteer for supports gay rights - badges remind. You’ll be wanting to hold “Straight Pride” next …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Benjemen fucking butter!!



Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.