You're so wrong on this case it hurts. Literally just read the court files the farther released. It shows the mother is in the right, and the farther is a religious bigot who is a liar and abuser.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HC6NppFc_q4qEPmiST7IQvKsZkJep8TO/view …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what the fuck Sheila
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Or both parents could tell the child the truth i.e. 'you can have long hair, play with dolls, wear dresses, in fact do everything girls do and it's great and perfectly normal. You don't need to call yourself a girl for any of that.' Gender nonconforming kids are fine as they are
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems obvious to me - it's the difference between 1. the truth i.e. supporting him performing stereotypical female behaviours with the acknowledgment that that doesn't mean he actually is an actual girl, and 2. the lie, that yes doing those things *means* he *is* a girl.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dunno, maybe some spurious objective basis like his biological sex!

- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's exactly what you're advocating. You've just changed their label which is just a word. Their biological sex hasn't changed, only the word to describe them has. You're telling them *because* they perform stereotypes of the opposite sex that they *are* the opposite sex.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely, it's far more revolutionary being a female presenting man and not giving a damn. Respect
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.