Yes
-
-
-
In a future when trans actors aren't passed over in favour of cis ones, yes, but not now.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. It’s called acting for a reason. It’s a person playing someone who is not themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When LGBTQ+ actors aren’t regularly excluded from being cast in any role, then yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scarlett is absolutely correct. She is an Actress and a damn good one. you can only criticize her if she fails to portray us successfully.
-
As a follow up to my previous post in support of Actress Scarlett Johansson, I very successfully acted the part of a Straight Man for the best part of 62 years. I fooled everyone, and I am not a professional actress. I should have won an Academy Award for my performance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get the point actors can embody any roll (maybe with sensitivity they can) but that doesn’t override or acknowledge the hetero-privilege in play. Non-queer portrayals of queer ppl have never been accepted for their offensiveness in the same way racial ones are beginning to be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure, but we can complain about those choices and boycott her movies. If we want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.