No. Just. No. She has created massive problems with her fiction, written what is essentially abuse porn for moms to read in public, and it's poorly edited garbage. Now she is profiting off of my community, too? I hope no one buys it.
-
-
-
Exactly! Her books are trash and I don't want her making money off our community. Even if it wasn't just abuse porn, it is still so badly written. Awful stuff. And I don't buy fiction about LGBT from non lgbt who are just jumping on the bandwagon to make money off the pink pound
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would I read it? I wouldn't even use it as kindling. Trees are actually going to die so a straight woman can write ignorant abuse porn for a community she cannot possibly understand. I hope it tanks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I saw someone with 50 Shades on the train and had a look over their shoulder at the book, expecting to be immersed in a world of sensual, seductive prose. It had the sexual resonance of DIY instructions that had been translated through four other languages into English. So: no.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
God I hope she reads the comments and realise that nobody wants thispic.twitter.com/njzPpIBXrR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
nah we good, keep it lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
There is FAR better stuff on AO3 than what she (and a lot of other people) writes.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.