Rather than jumping on the ‘tranzwomen r evul’ bandwagon, an actual read of the article suggests that the criminal identified as male in every other facet of his life, including court- nothing about hormones, name changes, etc.
-
-
-
The more logical conclusion, based on the the article, is that he was a gay male who cross-dressed for the sole purpose of tricking straight men into recorded sex, rather than somebody who had any inclination towards living and identifying full-time as a woman.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.