I don't believe that that's a fair statement. Much of the difficulty in making specific suggestions for how Facebook should change is that the company is not truthful or open about its data collection practices or business model. And yet, people do make suggestions, to no avail.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That is not an ad hominem attack. I deeply respect
@hillbrad too, and am not attacking him personally. I believe my analogy between his call for public debate over a secret system of mass surveillance, and similar calls from people in the national security sphere, is fair. - Show replies
-
-
-
Facebook wants the freedom to act unilaterally, without oversight, and remain accountable to no one except its founder, while holding critics to the highest standards of intellectual debate. While I believe in the integrity of people who work there, I also think that's nuts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I said felt personally responsible to apply and better my understanding of public ethics in my career (which precedes and will continue beyond FB) to how my profession influences power. I thought that was like, exactly your thing, but I guess not if you can dunk on Facebook?
-
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.