People who don’t get UBI complaining about people who do doesn’t say much about “welfare for all” because, well, it isn’t for all.
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It folded because it was a two year experiment. But that people who donate into the scheme will chafe at it is my argument
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But that’s precisely my point:of *course* people who pay in *and get nothing* will change. That’s why the universal bit matters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I get your point. Personally, I don’t believe that whether or not people paying in get money back makes freeloading any less of a problem for the political viability of such s program
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Fair; I think that’s one of the open UBI questions (that this study doesn’t really address). OTOH we do have some data from other programs that lean the other way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What are some good other experiments to look at?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Broadly speaking, we can see a massive difference in the US in the political support for, say, RSDI/Medicare vs. TANF/Medicaid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is UK specific and focused on outcomes, but has a good bibliography and summary of the literature. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/wwwlboroacuk/content/crsp/downloads/reports/Means%20testing%20or%20Universalism_Final%20Report.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Thank you!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.