don’t think of it as moon shots, but capacity building. Long-shot districts are a valuable political laboratory
-
-
Do you think Republicans are missing out on capacity building by not contesting safe Democratic districts?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xenocryptsite @rfilmyer
I think “safe” red districts are different in kind. Dems have lost the capacity to talk to rural voters
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I remember when Democrats ran dozens of well-funded candidates in a lot of tough districts. It was 2010, they were called "incumbents", and they mostly lost. IDK if any capacity was built.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @xenocryptsite @rfilmyer
there are open seats in R+5 districts in Ohio where the Democrats have no one viable running. It’s not getting done
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I mean. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/23/2018-fundraising-democrats-house-races-244044 …pic.twitter.com/gMKPkq0krY
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @xenocryptsite @rfilmyer
I’m asserting there are winnable districts that are not seeing this funding. I’ve been out fundraising for them
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I mean yeah, Dan Boren was nearly unopposed in 2010 too. IDK if that proves anything.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xenocryptsite
at this point I’m not sure what we’re arguing about, and feel bad for poor
@rfilmyer who got swept up in this thread2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I only mean: 1. Neither party runs well-funded candidates in "every winnable district", let alone "every district", as a rule. 2. I have not seen any analysis that indicates D House recruitment/fundraising is being particularly badly allocated (except that
@Nate_Cohn piece).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I can give you a list of a dozen winnable districts that right now lack an adequately funded Democratic candidate
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.