I mean it'd be a nice experiment I suppose. Do Republicans ask why they don't have well-funded candidates running in CA-40 or whatever?
at this point I’m not sure what we’re arguing about, and feel bad for poor @rfilmyer who got swept up in this thread
-
-
I only mean: 1. Neither party runs well-funded candidates in "every winnable district", let alone "every district", as a rule. 2. I have not seen any analysis that indicates D House recruitment/fundraising is being particularly badly allocated (except that
@Nate_Cohn piece). -
I can give you a list of a dozen winnable districts that right now lack an adequately funded Democratic candidate
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.